US Military To Make The “Morning-After” Pill Available

By Susan Tyrrell

The US Military is nothing if not consistent. Perhaps our first clue should have been in late 2009 when Army Major Nidal Hasan was charged with killing 13 people at the Killeen Army base, instead of the 14 that should have been counted, since one woman was pregnant. We are used to the double standard in this nation that almost always charges people (correctly) with two murders if they are accused of killing a pregnant woman yet allows abortion as legalized murder.

This is why I was grieved, but not shocked, when I saw this article over the weekend which announced that the US military has decide to make the “morning-after” pill available at all US military health care facilities worldwide.

“The decision to carry the pill, often referred to as the morning-after pill, was based on a recommendation by the Pentagon's Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, an advisory panel made up of medical professionals from the military services, Pentagon officials said Friday.”

Apparently the Department of Defense is now in the abortion business. Citing a desire for “uniformity,” the Pentagon spokesperson told CNN that it was a “clinical” decision. This decision makes the abortion pill a “core drug,” which is then required to be carried by all department health facilities.

Once again, we see that our national level leaders are showing a disregard for the value of life. This pill is not simply “contraception,” as many argue. It can actually abort the baby by preventing an already-fertilized egg from being implanted in the uterus. While the military may see this as a fine line, it’s not. If pregnancy has begun, a life has formed. But clearly, to the military, what’s more important is allowing sexual behavior without responsibility:

If your superiors don’t count your baby as being alive, then go to the pharmacy, take your pill and get back on duty. And if you do it again, repeat this process.

This decision is wrong on so many levels that one blog entry can’t cover them all, but consider the implication of this with the fact that our nation continues to devalue life at a national level, not only with the legalization of abortion, but now with the much-debated health care plan. Consider that the military carries with it a power structure that could lead to a superior “urging” someone to go “take care of last night” so she can get on with her job.

It’s bad enough that this pill even exists, but now a new pill, which will kill a baby for up to five days into his or her life, has been introduced in Europe and is trying to get its claws in the United States.

Every little decision creates a path to a bigger consequence by subtly desensitizing us to its reality. How long will it be before the military considers this new abortion pill a core formulary, as well? When those who are elected and appointed to defend life and our own soil, turn and issue decrees that devalue the life of the children who are part of this nation, then something is grossly wrong.

Nationally, we continue to create an atmosphere of desensitization to life. Take a pill here, a “procedure” there, and pretty soon you control your “reproductive health.” Planned Parenthood founder and eugenics supporter, Margaret Sanger would be proud of this decision. And that right there is a reason to speak out now before the peace of more babies is held in the name of “clinical” decisions.

About the Author

Susan Tyrrell is a college instructor and will graduate this summer from Texas A&M University with her PhD in educational psychology. She is the leader of Bound4LIFE in Gadsden, AL. Now that she has successfully completed her dissertation, she is working on a book with a former professor on Christian education and merging academic and biblical development-when she's not blogging for Bound4LIFE, of course.

Comments RSS

  • LKB says:

    February 09, 2010 at 03:41PM

    I know that this is not very much related to the article, but I have a scenario question (I’m also pro-life, so this is not one of those in-your-face pro-choice questions). I’m just curious:
    Would a morning-after pill be okay for a girl who just got…well…attacked? How should we as pro-lifers approach this issue?

  • Susan Tyrrell says:

    February 09, 2010 at 08:19PM

    LKB, that’s always a tough one to answer not because the answer is so hard but because my heart breaks for such a situation. If we believe life has begun with fertilization, and we know the pill can stop a fertilized egg from implantation in the uterus, which we do, then I don’t think I could make an exception in what I think is right. It’s like asking about rape and incest. It is a horrible tragedy, but you don’t compound tragedy with tragedy, you know? One of the biggest issues with an abortion pill is that it makes it seem like it didn’t really happen. But it still did, or could. I would hate to go through life wondering if I had taken a pill that caused death. There is so much redemption and hope in Jesus for a victim of any horrible crime, so much healing that can come. I think when we face things, deal with them, and carry them honestly to the cross, we find more relief and healing than a pill might con us into believing for a while. That said, I grieve at the very idea. But we must stand for Life if we believe what we say, and seek our answers in Jesus, and not the world. That’s how I see it as a fellow pro-lifer.

  • Brian Sears says:

    February 25, 2010 at 08:33PM

    Susan,
    Thanks for bringing attention to this. Know that there are many of us in the military that are shocked and moved to prayer and intercession at the news of this decision. Truly, the military, which should be in the business of protecting innocent people should have nothing to do with the murder of the most innocent. Keep us in your prayers as we try to change things from the inside.